News

Ghana Somubi Dwumadie Grantee Progress Report

Completed every Quarter including financial report and statements.

Section A: Project performance over last quarter

A.1 Project Summary

GRANT DETAILS

 

Name of organisation Foundation For Community Empowerment Programme (FOCEP)
Project title

 

 

Promoting Disability Inclusive Development (PDID).

Call   

Small Grants Round Two (Evidence and effectiveness grants for mental health and disability inclusion)

Reporting period (Indicate the quarter and the specific months)

 

First Quarter ( April-June 2021
Coalition members and Lead Organisation (if applicable)  

Not Applicable

Name of project manager

 

 

Solomon Akanpisi
Address, e-mail and tel. no.

 

 

focep2017@gmail.com

akanpisisolomon@gmail.com

0546005805

A.2: Project overview

Overview of the project
Project Goal: Promoting equal rights and opportunities for all

Project Outcomes:

1. Increased awareness and responsiveness of stakeholders on disability issues to remove negative barriers

2. Enhanced knowledge of Decentralized Heads of departments on disability and mental health issues to influence inclusive planning

3. Empowered PWD’s and PWMHD’s for community sustainability

Self-assessment of performance over the implementation period under review

How has your project performed during the quarter?

Describe in not more than one page the progress made towards the project goal and objectives by highlighting key achievements during the quarter. Analyze the progress against the targets in the results framework.

To start with, the project inception workshop training was successfully organized by bringing together 50 stakeholders consisting of District Chief Executive, traditional leaders, religious leaders, executive members of Disabled People’s Organizations (DPO’s) and Mental Health Self-Help Groups, heads of decentralized departments of the District Assembly, NGO’s, and other Community Based Organizations. The inception training workshop achieved 100% success rate because the planned target was 50 stakeholders as against 50 stakeholders who participated. The Executive Director used this platform to inform the stakeholders the rationale behind project intervention which seeks to promote equal rights and opportunities for persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions in the District to enhance inclusive development. He also indicated that it is a one year project intervention with funding support from UKaid which is being implemented by FOCEP in partnership with Ghana Somobi Dwumadie (Ghana Participating Programme).

During the period under review, the project implementation team organized a training workshop on disability rights and inclusion for 50 stakeholders (13 females and 37 males) consisting of religious and traditional leaders as well as executive members of DPO’s and SHG’s. This activity was successfully carried out with a success rate of 100% because 50 stakeholders were earmarked according to the plan which has been achieved. The chiefs, queen mothers, religious leaders and executive members of the various DPO’s and SHG’s were excited with the training because their capacities have been built and they are well-equipped with appropriate knowledge to promote the rights of persons with disabilities and persons with mental health disabilities to enhance inclusive development. The participants were full of excitement to FOCEP for making available the Disability and mental health Acts to them for the first time after many years of its existence to serve as a reference document to guide them in their advocacy work in their respective communities.

Another major achievement chalked by the project is the successful implementation of the community radio discussion programme to create awareness on disability and mental health disability issues to enhance inclusion at all levels of society. The project management team developed an MOU with radio YK FM located in Yagba and the radio discussions has since commenced. The project implementation team also organized a training session for radio panellist to guide them as a measure to enhance their communication and advocacy skills. A total of 50 panellist made up of persons with disabilities and persons with mental health disabilities were trained according to plan thereby attaining a success rate of 100%. A total of 13 radio airtime slots were planned within the first quarter 11 slots were achieved representing 85% success rate. The underperformance is due to the late start of the project implementation and procedural bottlenecks regarding the signing of MOU between FOCEP and YK FM.

Equally important milestone achievement chalked by the project implementation team is the effective organization of the monthly and quarterly review meetings of the various DPO’s and SHG’s in the District. A total number of 5 DPO’s and two SHG’s were able to meet for their monthly and quarterly review meetings. During the review meeting the following pertain issues were discussed: group dynamics, effective utilization of the Disability Fund, safeguarding issues, referral pathways and effective engagement with duty bearers. The total number of people who participated were 50 persons with disabilities (32) and persons with mental health conditions (18) against 50 planned for the period representing 100% success rate.

The project implementation team within the period organized capacity development training on inclusive education for 53 executives of DPO’s and SHG’s as well as some selected classroom teachers. The project team over-achieved its targets by training 53 participants as against 50 participants planned for the period representing 106% success rate. The participants were taking through basic principles of the inclusive education policy, physical accessibility, basic teaching and learning materials for children with special needs and the right of a child with disability to education

In addition, the project implementation team organized an interface meeting between DPOs, SHGs and District Authorities on matters affecting PWDs in the Mamprugu-Moaduri District as a measure to ensure equal rights and opportunities for the persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions. This platform gave the PWD’s and PWMHD’s the opportunities to ask duty bearers certain pertinent questions in respect to their needs such as: employment opportunities within Youth Employment Agency, lack of transparency in the disbursement of the Disability fund, lack of special education teachers to handle children with disabilities, lack of mental health officers and shortage of psychotropic and anti-epileptic drugs among others. Under this activity the project implementation team over-performed by organizing 52 stakeholders for the interface meeting as against 50 stakeholders planned for the period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.3: Progress against work plan

Reporting Quarter April-June, 2021
Describe the work accomplished to date. Activities agreed in the agreement workplan should be listed here in the order in which they appear. A description of work accomplished or ongoing to date should follow each activity.
Activity #[1] Planned activities as per work plan Progress to date

(activities achieved over the period)

Variance (difference between achieved and planned) Reasons for variance Notes – Refer to # in Financial Report
1.1.1 Organize training for 50 religious and traditional leaders on the disability/mental health disability rights and inclusive disability  50 religious and traditional leaders trained as against 50 planned for the period representing 100% success rate No variance in the activity implementation There exist no variance PV. No. 01 /05/21
1.1.2 Organize project inception meeting for 50 primary and secondary stakeholders 50 stakeholders participated according to the target plan representing 100% success rate No variance in the activity implementation There exist no variance PV. No. 02/05/21
1.1.3 Organize 13 community radio programmes to create awareness on disability and mental health rights for social inclusion The community radio program has commenced with 11 slots as against 13 slots planned. In addition 50 radio panellist have been trained according to the plan constituting 100% success rate 11 airtime slots organized as against 13 slots planned for the period. This has been underachieved representing 85% success rate, However 50 radio panellist were trained per the plan representing 100%  success The variance of 2 slots airtime underperformance was due to delay in the start of activity implementation

There exist no variance under the radio panellist training.

PV. No. 03/07/21
1.1.4 Organize capacity development training for 50 executive members of SHG’s and DPO’s on inclusive education 52 stakeholders received training on inclusive education  as against 50 planned representing 102% success rate Positive variance by exceeding the planned target by 2 The positive variance is through effective engagements with stakeholders PV. No. 01/06/21
2.1.4 Organize interface meetings between DPOs , SHGs and District Authorities on matters affecting PWDs 53 stakeholders had interface meetings as against 50 stakeholders planned representing 103% success rate Attainment of positive variance of exceeding the planned target by 3 Through effective engagement of stakeholders PV. No. 02/06/21
3.1.3 Organizing monthly/quarterly review meetings with various SHG’s/DPO’s 50 PWD’s and PWMHD’s participated in the monthly/quarterly as against 50 persons representing 100% success rate. There was variance Through effective communication and community mobilization strategies PV. No. 02/07/21
4.1.1          
5.1.1          

 

A.4: Project work plan for next quarter

Describe the planned activities for the next quarter, noting any key changes to the activities set out in the agreement work plan. Quarter : August-October, 2021
Activity #[2] Planned activities for next quarter Key changes from contract work plan Reasons for changes from contract work plan Notes – Refer to # in Financial Report
1.1.3 Organize 15 community radio programmes to create awareness on disability and mental health rights for social inclusion No changes required Not applicable Not applicable
2.2.1 Develop and produce 400 simplified copies of the Disability Act (Act 715) and Mental Health Act (Act 846) for members of the various DPO’s and SHG’s during interface meetings No changes required Not applicable Not applicable
2.2.3 Organize mid-term and end of project debriefing of progress of activities No changes required Not applicable Not applicable
3.1.1 Strengthening of existing 10 SHG’s  for effective advocacy engagement with duty bearers No changes required Not applicable Not applicable
3.1.3 Orgznizing monthly/quarterly review meetings with various SHG’s/DPO’s No changes required Not applicable Not applicable
3.1.3 To facilitate training of 5 DPO’s and 5 SHG’s on key advocacy strategies and MDTP processes to enhance Rights Based Approach (RBA) to development. No changes required Not applicable Not applicable
3.1.5 Training of staff/DPO’s /SHG’s leaders on safeguarding and other essential policies No changes required Not applicable Not applicable
3.1.5 Training of staff in safeguarding and other essential policies No changes required Not applicable Not applicable

 

A.5: Key Performance Indicators

Please complete the”Indicator Tracker” sheet in the Results Framework

Briefly explain or give reasons for under-achievement and/or over achievement in output targets, if any.

The project implementation team during the period under review, underperformed in its radio program activity due to late commencement of the entire project intervention. The project team was able to facilitate 11 airtime slots as against 13 airtime slots planned within the first period representing 85% success rate. However, plans are far advanced to ensure that the two remaining airtime slots is fully used in the second quarter.

It is pertinent to note that, during project implementation the team over-performed in the area of capacity developing training in inclusive education for executives leaders of  DPO’s  and SHG’s  as well as classroom teachers in the operational area. The project implementation team over-achieved by training 52 stakeholders as against 50 planned for the first quarter. The over-achievement is as a result of effective consultation and high attendance of stakeholders.

Another activity that the project implementation team over-achieved is the interface engagement meetings between executives of DPO’s, SHG’s and District Authorities within the first quarter. According to the plan 50 stakeholders were earmarked for the interface meeting as against 53 stakeholders participating in the interface meeting. The over-achievement was due to effective communication and community mobilization skills.

It is equally refreshing to note that during the period of activity implementation, the project over-achieved its targets in the monthly/quarterly review meetings of SHG’s and DPO’s in the district.  Per the project implementation plan 50 persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions were earmarked and 50 persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions participated in the monthly and quarterly review meetings representing 100% success rate. The overachievement is through effective communication and community mobilization skills as well as holding the meetings in their respective communities.

 

 

 

A6: Participants Reached

Note that some projects may be asked to report key relevant metrics, such as numbers of people reached, or levels of stakeholder engagement. This will be agreed on a case-by-case basis with grantees.

TOTAL Numbers Reached (Disaggregate your results by gender and other social groups)  
  Category Male Female Sub-groups  

Source and how figures provided were computed

People with disabilities Mental health  conditions Health care workers Caregivers C-19 infected persons Community leaders Others
Individuals
(beneficiaries) Reached[3]

 

Direct Reach[4]

(see footnote)

214 91 172 40 0 0 0 33 60 Activity reports and attendance registers
Indirect Reach[5]

(see footnote)

642 273 516 120 0 0 0 99 180 Feedback from direct beneficiaries( 1 direct beneficiary reach out to at least 3 persons),
Implementing Locations (Districts) in the quarter Mamprugu Moaduri District (Yagba, Kobori, Djadema, Loagri  and Yirezesi)
Individuals
(beneficiaries) reached through the MEDIA (traditional/new media)
Listenership   Awaiting response from YK FM for Geopole data
Readership    
Viewership    

 

A.7: Unintended Outcomes

Indicate any unintended results/outcomes/change (both positive and negative) that have occurred because of your project
 

One major unintended outcome, during the project intervention is the identification of children with disabilities through some stakeholders whose were hiding them. FOCEP has registered and referred these children to see a specialist to assess their disabilities. The children have since been diagnosed and asked to undertake X Ray for further assessment for corrective surgeries to be done by an orthopaedic surgeon. FOCEP project implementation team will continue to follow up to ensure that the children are sent by their parents for appropriate medical intervention.

 

Another unintended results/outcome attained during the project implementation, is the District Director for Food and Agriculture requesting for data base of all persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions who are interested in agriculture to enable the department of Food and Agriculture include them in the government flagship programme of Planting for Food and Jobs in the next planting season to ensure that PWD’s and PWMHD’s benefit from the initiative.

 

The interface meeting led to the attainment of a very important unintended results/outcome with respect to the disbursement of the disability fund. The District Coordinating Director and some departmental directors have agreed to meet with the leadership of the various DPO’s and SHG’s to have an in depth discussions with the District Chief Executive (DCE) on how to ensure transparency and accountability of the disability fund. However, the leadership of the DPO’s and SHG’s proposed that the engagement should be held when the President of Ghana appoints the various MMDCE’s since this will help whoever is appointed as the DCE to appreciate the enormity of the concerns raised and also understand the plight of the PWD’s as far as the disability fund management is concerned. In view of this, this engagement will be held immediately the DCE is appointed and confirmed by the Assembly.

 

 

 

A.8: Challenges, particular successes or other lessons learned from the project

Challenges in implementing during this period and mitigation – highlight the challenges you encountered during the period of implementation and how they were mitigated to reduce impact.
One major challenge is the heavy rains which periodically affects project activities and so sometimes when it rains throughout the day that particular activity is re-scheduled for another day for implementation.

 

 

Which of your strategies/ approaches or ways of working (including advocacy actions) were most effective and how did they help in achieving your results?
One of the strategies or approaches adopted which has produced results is through the involvement of community members and using some of them as volunteers particularly persons with disabilities and persons with mental health disabilities in the consultation process with stakeholders has yielded positive results.

Another successful strategy adopted which also yielded positive results is our advocacy intervention by using the participatory approach of beneficiaries and allowing persons with disabilities and persons with mental health disabilities to own and lead the advocacy engagements especially the radio program.

 

 

Lessons Learnt – what other lessons emerged during the period and how have these been used, or are being used to inform and improve the project?
The lessons learnt is that the District Assembly was not consulting persons with disabilities with respect to utilization of how the disability fund should be used. As a result of the interface meeting this was revealed and steps are being taking to resolve the issues to ensure adequate consultation and transparency with the disbursement.

Another lesson learnt is that traditional authorities are willing to play leading roles in advocating for the rights of persons with disabilities and mental health conditions to promote inclusive society.

 

A.9: Cross-cutting issues

Participation of people with disabilities, including mental health disabilities: Highlight the extent to which your activities have contributed to and enabled participation of these groups
 

The radio panellist discussions are being led by persons with disabilities and persons with mental health disabilities in advocating for their fundamental human rights. In addition, in most community mobilization initiatives, the persons with disabilities lead the process.

 

Participation of women: Highlight the extent to which your activities have contributed to and enabled participation of these groups
 

The project implementation team as part of measures to promote women participation, involved queen mothers from all the participating communities to participate in most activities to enhance their participation. In addition, most caregivers are women and so the project implementation also made sure that they are well represented to enhance their participation.

 

Overall participatory and inclusive approaches: Highlight the extent to which your activities generally have taken participatory and inclusive approaches to engaging your project participants
 

The project implementation team used local content participatory and inclusive approach to its project interventions by ensuring that all strategic stakeholders such as the chiefs, queen mothers, heads of departments of the District Assembly, women’s groups, persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions were all adequately consulted and briefed about the overall goal and objectives of the project. This approach has led to high participation of all the stakeholders thereby producing positive results.

 

 

A.10: Value for money considerations and Sustainability

Describe how the project has ensured value for money (VFM)
Efficiency (How have you made the best use of resources to achieve results? In addition to your submission, kindly report on the following: i. Proportion of grants funds spent to date (burn rate)

The project management team as part of measures to ensure judicious use of resources established a three member procurement committee to ensure value for money. The committee has been able to negotiate to reduce prices of snacks and food to enable more participants to participate in activity implementations without compromising with quality of the service. The burnt rate of funds spent is about  55.18%

 

 

Effectiveness (How have you worked towards ensuring results are achieved?) In addition to your submission, kindly report on the following: i. Proportion of indicator targets met)

The project implementation team used the best strategies to engage with stakeholders to ensure that positive results are attained. For instance the project inception meeting target was met. The religious and traditional leader’s workshop training target was also met. The capacity building training of DPO’s/SHG’s and teachers target was exceeded. In addition, the interface meeting between DPO’s, SHG’s and district authorities exceeded its target. The monthly/quarterly review meetings were organized and target set was attained. The radio panellist training was successfully organized and target met.

 

 

Economy (How have you kept the cost of implementing your project down? In addition to your submission, kindly report on cost savings made during the quarter)

The procurement team negotiated for a reduction in the prices of snack and lunch which is always used to cater for the excess participants during activity implementation.

 

 

Equity (How have you ensured that the benefits are distributed fairly? How has the project prioritized the vulnerable, excluded and hard to reach?)

 

The project implementation team focuses more attention on persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions in all its activity implementation to ensure that their needs are addressed. In addition, the project implementation team also focuses more attention on disadvantage communities or hard to reach communities to promote the rights of persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions. Again to ensure equity, the Youth Employment Agency has assured persons with disabilities to give them employment opportunities irrespective of their disability once they have the qualification and productive capacity to work.

 

 

Sustainability (How is the project sustaining or intends to sustain the gains/results realised from the project?)

As part of measures to consolidate the gains of the project intervention after the end of the project, the project implementation team is closely working in collaboration with the various DPO’s, SHG’s, Department of Social Welfare and Community Development, Commission on Administrative and Human Rights, District Assembly, traditional and religious leaders, women’s groups, Community based organizations and relevant NGO’s to enable this organizations to own the project interventions so that after the end of the project they can facilitate the continuity of the interventions.

 

 

 

A.11: Partnership with others

Provide examples of active partnerships with others in implementing this project: DPOs, SHGs and CSOs partners
The project implementation team is actively implementing the project activities in partnership with executive’s members of the various DPO’s, SHG’s, and CRS in the District. For instance the radio discussions sessions are being led by persons with disabilities and persons with mental health conditions and in some instances community volunteers.

 

 

 

A.12: Participant Feedback

Provide feedback collated or collected directly from participant/user/beneficiary on the project being implemented
One major feedback received from a persons with disability is that this project intervention has come to teach them how to fish so that when they need fish they can go out to fish for themselves.

Another feedback received from a beneficiary is that if you know your rights you can demand for what is due you and you can also hold duty bearers accountable if they do not live up to expectation in the discharged of their duties.

 

 

Section B: Risks, Safe-guarding and any Recommendations

B1: Risks

Describe emerging contextual risks associated with disability or mental health that occurred this quarter or are forthcoming. Eg planned community protest and harassment of DPOs or provider, or supportive religious and traditional leaders holding sessions

You can add more lines if needed

Risks or supportive activity Quarter happened or is planned to happen What steps are being taken to mitigate these risks
No risk occurred  Not applicable Not applicable
     
     

 

B.2: Safeguarding issues reporting

Describe any safeguarding concerns or other reportable incidents during the last quarter. You can add more lines if needed
Reported by Date reported Description of safeguarding incident or concern Action taken
 

No reported case

No case No case No case
       

 

B.4: Grantee Feedback and Recommendations to Ghana Somubi Dwumadie

Provide constructive feedback and recommendation to the Ghana Somubi Dwumadie Grants Team to improve their support to your project implementation.
 

The implementation team will request for regular field monitoring visits to project sites to assess progress of activity implementation and also to provide technical assistance to the implementing partner.

 

 

 

 

Section C: Mandatory documents

The following documents are to be submitted with this report

 

No. Document Submitted Date Submitted
1 Financial report Yes/No 27/08/2021
2 Cash book (for both cash and bank payments) Yes/No 27/08/2021
3 Bank reconciliation and bank statements Yes/No 27/08/2021
5 Procurement plan and quotations comparison matrix (If any) Yes/No 27/08/2021
6 Advance Funds request form Yes/No 27/08/2021
7 Supporting documentations for expenses reported Yes/No 27/08/2021
8 Activity reports Yes/No 27/08/2021
9 Any relevant photos (with appropriate consent) and / or most significant impact stories or case studies Yes/No 27/08/2021

 

 

Progress report reviewed by: [Enoch Dokurugu and                                  DATE: 27th August, 2021

 

Progress report approved by:[Solomon Akanpisi and          ] DATE: 27th August, 2021

[1] This should refer to the activity number in the work plan

[2] This should refer to the activity number in the work plan

[3] Individuals (participants) reached by project activities is defined as direct and indirect.

[4] Direct = All project participants reached directly through planned activities implemented

[5] Indirect = others who are closely reached or impacted by the project activities. These are persons reached by direct project participants

*Please note that PWDs/Children/Youth and others are sub-groups to the Male and Female main groups. As such the Male and Female totals should include all the sub-groups

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *